The Word War
Whatever happened to the “War on Terror”?
Winning back the admiration and allegiance of people around the world
will require more than sending Karen Hughes to Cairo and Karl Rove to
Hollywood. It will mean demonstrating to people in far-flung countries
that America is working to improve their lives and that it believes
their future is inextricably linked to ours. It will mean seeing a
dictator such as Pakistan’s General Pervez Musharraf as an opponent of
America’s work, not an ally. Most importantly, it will require a new
approach to our present conflict: an understanding that we won’t be
successful until we stop arguing about renaming the War on Terror and
start redefining it. The “terror” we should be confronting is not just
that which we face from terrorism, but the terror they face from
despair. And battling that terror will require every weapon America has
in its arsenal for this new kind of war.
Henry A Wallace after he lost to Harry Truman in 1948 sent Truman a note saying " The destiny and salvation of the United States is to serve the world---not to dominate it"
Dec 13, 2007, 9:42 PMI thought is "War of Terror."
Dec 14, 2007, 4:34 AM"In the age of nuclear weapons, either we talk to each other or we all die!"
The "War on Terror," I agree makes a good "bumper sticker."
American foreign policy has followed a path of "Killing Hope" (US Military and CIA Interventions since WW2). William Blum
And that's only from WW2
Save the world from, American Benevolence!
sierra
NIce work, Andrei.
Jan 9, 2008, 4:42 PMPost a Comment


