Issue #7, Winter 2008

The Word War

Whatever happened to the “War on Terror”?

Winning back the admiration and allegiance of people around the world will require more than sending Karen Hughes to Cairo and Karl Rove to Hollywood. It will mean demonstrating to people in far-flung countries that America is working to improve their lives and that it believes their future is inextricably linked to ours. It will mean seeing a dictator such as Pakistan’s General Pervez Musharraf as an opponent of America’s work, not an ally. Most importantly, it will require a new approach to our present conflict: an understanding that we won’t be successful until we stop arguing about renaming the War on Terror and start redefining it. The “terror” we should be confronting is not just that which we face from terrorism, but the terror they face from despair. And battling that terror will require every weapon America has in its arsenal for this new kind of war.

Issue #7, Winter 2008
 
Post a Comment

Ferd:

Henry A Wallace after he lost to Harry Truman in 1948 sent Truman a note saying " The destiny and salvation of the United States is to serve the world---not to dominate it"

Dec 13, 2007, 9:42 PM
Borat:

I thought is "War of Terror."

Dec 14, 2007, 4:34 AM
sierra:

"In the age of nuclear weapons, either we talk to each other or we all die!"



The "War on Terror," I agree makes a good "bumper sticker."



American foreign policy has followed a path of "Killing Hope" (US Military and CIA Interventions since WW2). William Blum



And that's only from WW2



Save the world from, American Benevolence!



sierra

Dec 15, 2007, 5:52 PM
Nick Hanauer:

NIce work, Andrei.

Jan 9, 2008, 4:42 PM

Post a Comment

Name

Email

Comments (you may use HTML tags for style)

Verification

Note: Several minutes will pass while the system is processing and posting your comment. Do not resubmit during this time or your comment will post multiple times.