Issue #8, Spring 2008

Total Tax Credit

To read the other essays in the “What's Next? The New Progressive Agenda” symposium, click here.

The Social Security payroll tax hurts working Americans–and it’s getting worse. Because the tax (a flat levy of 15.3 percent, combining the nominal employer portion with the nominal employee portion) applies to income only up to $97,500 (with a scheduled increase to $102,000 this year), it is inherently, grossly regressive, falling far more heavily on working Americans than on the rich. At the same time, as a result of rising pre-tax wage inequality, the payroll tax system is growing dramatically more regressive. In 1983, 90 percent of wages and salaries were subject to payroll taxation; today, thanks to ballooning elite incomes above the Social Security payroll tax cap, only 84.9 percent of wages and salaries are subject to the payroll tax. As Christian Weller of the Center for American Progress has pointed out, this represents a huge, invisible tax cut for the affluent. At the same time, two-thirds of taxpayers owe more payroll taxes than income taxes.

Meanwhile, Americans who do not make enough money to need to file individual income tax returns are frozen out of tax credits for which they would otherwise be eligible. Right now, the child tax credit is only partly refundable (payable by the Treasury to citizens who do not pay income taxes), and the home mortgage interest deduction is not refundable at all. This means that millions of working-class Americans who benefit society at great personal expense by raising children and buying property are denied subsidies that their middle-class neighbors enjoy.

To address both these challenges with a single reform, we should apply all existing income tax credits against income and payroll taxes combined in a Total Tax Credit system. The total tax calculation–adding income taxes and Social Security payroll taxes, and deducting tax credits from the sum–could be done annually. In order to avoid requiring all Americans, including those who owe no income taxes, to file tax returns, we could let employers do the simple math. Employees with homes and children would get a fraction of the home mortgage deduction and the child tax credit left in their payroll taxes every two weeks. They would not need to wait for rebates after April 15. More take-home pay would show up in every paycheck. Working Americans who pay no income taxes would not be the only citizens who would be helped by the Total Tax Credit system. Many income tax payers would have a larger personal tax base against which to claim credits.

Wouldn’t this blow a hole in Social Security revenues? Indeed, it would. But the hole could be filled partly by lifting the cap on the payroll tax and–if more revenue is necessary–by an infusion of general revenues, perhaps augmented by a value-added tax (VAT) or another federal consumption tax. Medicare already is paid for by a mixture of payroll taxes and general revenues, and there is no reason why this could not be as well.

Rare is the single reform that can accomplish several important objectives at once, by methods that are simple, straightforward and politically attractive. The cap-and-share Total Tax Credit system is such a reform. It would make the Social Security payroll tax more progressive, while retaining it rather than abolishing it; and it would allow millions of households that pay no income tax to enjoy tax breaks for home ownership, children and other purposes. Best of all, instead of requiring the establishment of new programs, the Total Tax Credit system would require only the modification of existing laws. That’s a combination that’s hard to beat.


More from Democracy: A Journal of Ideas

Reinvent Medicare by David Kendall

Read More »
Issue #8, Spring 2008
Post a Comment

Libertarian Paternalist:

I do not think that the way forward for the US is making the same mistakes that Sweden did. We had a underfunded Pay As You Go system. It was unsustainable already 20 years after inception 1980. It was fixed in 1997. Now the Swedish Pension system is the envy of the world, a fully funded, completely secure system with individually linked pension accounts. A basic fully funded state pension and a IRA type of account on top.

Sweden has a VAT of 25 %. Income taxes for low income families is 60 %.

The way forward for the US is to secure fully fund the Social Security system and make it stable as Sweden did. It took harsh reforms and a cutting of entitlements, for some individuals up to 50 %. I myself was one of those, I do not complain, it had to be done or Sweden would have been bankrupt because of underfunded entitlements in the 2030's and I would have received no pension at all.

So the US needs the market solutions and privatization efforts taken by the Swedes. why on earth would you go the disastrous way we choose in the 70's, socializing, raising taxes by 50 % of GDP etc. It lead to a ballooning Public Sector, totally unsustainable, it also lead to Sweden dropped from having the best welfare system in the world and the strongest economy to a dismal position today.

I moved to the US to get away from Sweden's decline for my daughters sake but I am now very worried that the US seems to be set to do the exactly same mistakes we did 30 years ago. I do not believe my eyes.

A ballooning public sector, underfunded Entitlements, massive tax hikes and socialized health care are not solutions for the US. the whole of Europe is moving away from it at a rapid pace.

Jun 3, 2008, 9:48 PM

Post a Comment



Comments (you may use HTML tags for style)


Note: Several minutes will pass while the system is processing and posting your comment. Do not resubmit during this time or your comment will post multiple times.