Issue #8, Spring 2008

What’s Next?

For at least a decade, progressive thinking has been imprisoned. The fighting faith of the twentieth century has been paralyzed by the need to protect its past achievements and by a divided political landscape that has left it capable of winning only bare majorities, curbing any initiatives for reform.

2008 marks the chance to begin anew. It’s our opportunity to present a new vision of ambition and scope to the nation that addresses the great challenges of our times, from the threats of Islamist terror and global warming to the transformations of the global economy and the aging Baby Boom. In January of next year, the United States has the chance not only to inaugurate a new president, but also a new progressivism.

This campaign season has shown an American public energized and engaged by the political process in ways not seen in a generation and more open to progressive arguments than in many years. However, for all this sense of possibility, we have seen a lack of imagination about what progressives can truly accomplish in America and the world. The media works 24 hours a day, but focuses on perceived candidate slights and stylistic differences. And despite the large number of presidential debates, they have revolved around the candidates’ pasts or minuscule policy differences. No one is asking–or answering–that simple, but vital question: what’s next?

That’s why we are dedicating a large part of this issue to putting forward a new progressive agenda. Democracy always has seen its role as revitalizing and renewing progressive thinking for a new century. Usually, we focus on ideas instead of policies–on overarching approaches rather than the specific proposals which follow from them. But, at this moment, we believe that it is critical to do something slightly different and present 20 specific policies that can point the way toward the next progressivism.

To arrive at this list, we contacted more than 600 policymakers, academics, thinkers, writers, and activists and asked them for their one big idea. We weren’t interested in policy tinkers nor the important, but common, policy prescriptions often bandied about. Instead, we looked for big–even radical–ideas that creatively addressed one of the major problems we face, and could conceivably be implemented someday soon. The responses cover the gamut: from the water crisis in the West to the prospects of peace in the Middle East, from middle-class schools to long-term care, and from ending foreign aid as we know it to curbing climate change. We hope these essays provoke a debate over these next nine months until the next president is sworn in, and start to shape the next progressive agenda.

End Foreign Aid As We Know It Larry Diamond

New Economy Safety Net Lael Brainard

Expand the House of Representatives Larry Sabato

Cap and Lease Carbon John Irons

A Helsinki Process for the Middle East Michael McFaul

Progressive Consumption Tax Robert Frank

Smart Development Subsidies Brad Carson

Affordable Long-Term Care Jeanne Lambrew

Public Diplomacy Cabinet Post William Galston

Middle-Class Schools for All Richard Kahlenberg

Tradable Water Rights Michael Greenstone

Home Guard Lawrence Korb

Pay-As-You-Drive Car Insurance Jason Bordoff

An SBA for Non-Profits Shirley Sagawa

After-School Coupons Andrew Rotherham

A Third Age Bill Gara LaMarche

Total Tax Credit Michael Lind

Reinvent Medicare David Kendall

Deepen Gun Ownership Jim Kessler

Community Insurance Robert Lawrence


More from Democracy: A Journal of Ideas

End Foreign Aid As We Know It by Larry Diamond

Read More »
Issue #8, Spring 2008
Post a Comment


In order to build a rational basis for progressivism, the pseudo-science we have known as economics must be replaced by thermodynamics. Production controls economy, thermodynamics controls production, and therefore thermodynamics controls economy. Profits are impossible under the second law of thermodynamics and their appearance in the economy indicates the presence of victims of the production and distribution processes.

The object of economy is the production and distribution of the goods and services of the world. The purpose of maintaining the social feature of economy to accomplish is the just distribution of employment. The interceding goal of “profit” is the true “market distortion” that poisons society.

Mar 27, 2008, 1:41 PM

Post a Comment



Comments (you may use HTML tags for style)


Note: Several minutes will pass while the system is processing and posting your comment. Do not resubmit during this time or your comment will post multiple times.