 |
This prospect provides good reason for the United States to bring
Iran to heel, not by bombing it, but by pursuing a cautious strategy of
normalization that ultimately undermines its hardliners and guides Iran
back to the regional fold. Deft U.S. diplomacy can help weaken a regime
that already appears to be losing its popularity and its grip on power.
Especially when it comes to foreign policy, there are other centers of
authority in Iran that bemoan the country’s growing isolation and favor
a more pragmatic course.
That said, even if Iran continues its confrontational ways, the GCC
should still seek to take the lead in promoting regional integration,
extending commerce and the habits of cooperation to Iraq. If Iran does
ultimately pursue a more moderate course, then the GCC will be poised
to provide a cooperative framework for the region as a whole,
capitalizing on a Gulf no longer threatened by the hegemonic ambitions
of either Iraq or Iran.
Should a reinvigorated GCC lead a cooperative security order in the
Gulf, the United States would be able to lighten its load in the
region, a necessary step to restore U.S. standing abroad as well as
political consensus at home. After Vietnam, the Nixon Doctrine
stipulated that the United States would look to local states to carry
more of the burden for their own security. After Iraq, a similar
doctrine is in the offing. And with Iran still a foe and Iraq in
shambles, the GCC provides the logical–if not the only–alternative to
U.S. power, even if it admittedly needs to deepen its own
institutionalization, collective character, and trust among its
members. It has the experience in regional integration as well as the
requisite military and economic assets. It is poised to have a
strengthened hand in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and in
Lebanon and Syria. Its close ties to the United States would ensure
considerable U.S. influence over regional developments. Moreover, since
such influence would be less overt, flowing through regional
intermediaries, it will be more politically palatable–which is
particularly important after the damage done to America’s image in the
Middle East by the Iraq war.
During the Cold War, West European nations took advantage of
America’s strategic umbrella to integrate with one another, ultimately
locking in a stable peace and ending their dependence upon U.S. power.
In similar fashion, GCC states should not have to choose between
alliance with the United States and regional integration; the two
options should work in unison, eventually leading to a Gulf region that
no longer needs to rely on the United States as an external protector.
|
 |
ISSUE #6, Fall 2007 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

Charles Kupchan is a professor of international affairs at Georgetown
University, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, and the
Henry A. Kissinger Scholar at the Library of Congress.


In Front of His Nose
Martin Kettle: Christopher Hitchens has had an orchestra seat from which to view history and has captured a lot—but what has he missed?
Why We Must Judge
Roger Berkowitz: It’s not all relative: Without judgment, a society loses its sense of justice.
From Democracy's Pages to Law of the Land
News: A letter from Editor Michael Tomasky on the signing of the financial regulatory reform bill -- and the new consumer financial watchdog it establishes that was first written about in Democracy.
Politico Discusses Michael Tomasky's
News: Writing in Politico, reporter Abby Phillip spoke with Michael Tomasky about his recent essay "Against Despair," which appeared in the Summer 2010 issue of Democracy.
Experts Respond to "The Baby Business"
News: Some of the world's leading adoption organizations and experts have responded to E.J. Graff's piece from our last issue.
America 2021: The Military and the World
The Defense Roundtable: Our largest threat: Pakistan. Our alliances: reshuffled by demographics. Terrorism: on the wane (maybe). New frontier for conflict: the Arctic cirlce. Four experts discuss
The Hezbollah Problem
Steven Simon and Jonathan Stevenson: To defang Iran, and help Lebanon and Israel, we must demilitarize Hezbollah. Which means we'll have to talk to them.
The Rove Legacy
Thomas B. Edsall: He concedes nothing. He accepts no responsibility. He blames liberals. Why Karl Rove is still an icon for today's Republicans.
Toward an i-Welfare State
James P. Pinkerton: When will all the benefits of e-commerce come to e-government? A response to the previous issue's symposium on liberalism.
The Debate Inside Iran
Nader Hashemi: Some fascinating Iranian intellectuals are laying the groundwork for democracy. What chance of success do they have?
V-Day in the Culture Wars
Ethan Porter: The culture wars are over, and we've won. We should learn to celebrate that--and move on to the next battle that demands our attention.
Against Despair
Michael Tomasky: How our misreading of history harms progressivism today.
DMV Liberalism
Joe Klein: Good governance--starting with transparency and citizen access--is the predicate for everything else.
What Happened to Women?
Katha Pollitt: Instead of moving to the center, liberalism should try embracing people who are actually liberals—starting with women.
Obama and Civic Idealism
Michael Sandel: Obama can still redefine liberalism, but he must bring economic power to heel.
Radical Sheet
Elbert Ventura: What the short, rumbustious history of Ramparts magazine means for modern journalism.
Wilson, Past and Present
Trygve Throntveit: The neoconservatives turned Woodrow Wilson into something he was not. In truth, Obama is more like him than Bush ever was.
That Old College Lie
Kevin Carey: Are our colleges teaching students well? No. But here's how to make them.
|
 |